Tuesday, June 29, 2010

Facebook Online Proxy Met Flash

Sul campionato del mondo di calcio (2)


subtitle: put the field in slow motion to determine if a goal is like putting the replays of the Italians in the ass for them to know who bugger is

Mass (?) of referee errors and the existence of electronic gadgets has made the antipodes of the world unite in a one voice: We want the field in slow motion! Blatter is least favorable to the photodetector on the goal line. As always in the field of human moves the problem a little 'beyond just the time to forget about personal responsibility (?). When will the slow-motion field in the time available for the fourth man or the arbitrator or a fifth of the former referee will be managed directly by the advertising agencies, which will compete to grab that moment of fate. In fact in football decisions are always taken at the time and I think you will continue to do so. You can not play while the result is outstanding. Players who will? They will say their peering il tabellone e se la prenderanno con loro stessi per non essere stati più attenti. E anche quando ci sarà il verdetto (il più presto possibile, si spera) chi sarà davvero contento? 
Il vero pallone della discordia è l'affidabilità delle nostre azioni. Quanti sono gli episodi contestati contro gli episodi incontestabili? Ognuno di noi conosce la risposta: non c'è proporzione. Allora quel momento di attesa frenetica in cui le sorti della partita saranno nelle mani di un giudice, se la tecnologia sarà accolta in campo, per il calcio si fischierà tre volte, perché non migliorerà il gioco, né la giustizia. Miglioreranno soltanto i conti in banca di quelli che speculano su un gioco knowing that too many people take it seriously.

Friday, June 25, 2010

Kaolin Clay Adding To Soap

ERRORISMO


the error is a disaster that kills many victims. Errors cells lurk in organizations, public bodies, ministries and all government. You too can be a victim of the error, but have you ever thought you might be unwitting pawn?
There are no laws against error, there is no obstacle for the error. We are all against the error and each of us is his most badass lieutenant. The error is not metaphysical: how many gods you have submitted and how much did you trust? the errors in your blood flowing and shake under your skin: There is no metaphor that might conceal, an allegory that the knights of the word can handle, there anacoluthon you can save.
not do what the error is expected, nor what he likes best: it is a lookout tower, you can not hide. E 'at the same time a tyrant king who sets you free and a queen caste, which promises you a night in her alcove.
Who has not committed an error?
the error is by its very nature infallible.

Wednesday, June 23, 2010

Precision Attachment Partial

Tutti i piedi della vostra vita



When will name the word "foot" and assigning specific adjectives each of you, my dear readers, will continue to read with a different image in his head of the body in question.
When the film "Lolita" by Stanley Kubrick shows the foot of the nymphet you, my dear readers, you'll still see the film set in tests the same image of the body part in question.

All feet you saw in your life: the foot of your parents, your siblings, your friends, the foot of your lovers, your feet massaged and feet beaten, ugly feet and feet beautiful. All the "your" feet are recalled to your mind when I mentioned the word foot by saying that I mentioned. When you see a foot in the cinema there's no way to make comparisons and use your memories. That 's what the foot (or the body or face) that you will love. Your mind has no active participation. Receives (and has) of what he sees. The relationship between the word "foot" that I misused to explain my idea and what it calls a game is all yours, not even in self-referential game that I made with you in mind be making you all walk of your life I have no responsibilities. The books do not exist without the players. And even this post. The film is like a statue. Literature is like a person.

Monday, June 21, 2010

Lorna Morgan 2010 Forum

disattivare l'account facebook (non è una guida è un tentativo)



When you try to disable the account on facebook you put more pictures taken in front of your friends and tell you that we shall miss you, are you sure you want to do?
When did you decide to disable the account on facebook you need to know why, it is mandatory.
Among the reasons you can choose from the obvious "I have a doubt about privacy" (in fact I have it) at the haunting "Do not I feel safe on Facebook! It is not enough to make a decision to do anything? Why do I motivate them? Mica us at school: "Teacher can I go to the bathroom?" and the Teacher: "Why?". "Because I decided that" you reply. "So go ahead."
I feel poised on a toasted crouton with a pitted olive is going to roll away taking with it all. I know you do not know what I'm talking about, but I know you have these quizzes. And if I'm wrong reasons and I do not disable the account? There is a special group for the disabled in suspense? A site of the fire and flames for the undecided, the traitors?
any option have a little advice for you: you really do not want to deactivate your account: you can not do without Facebook! Facebook! Facebook! It 's weird, did not appear Zuckemberg facebook after saying three times out loud! "This is a temporary state. I'll be back" is my favorite. Just go back with the same e-mail and the game-player will be restored as if nothing had happened, like the prodigal son will be welcomed back into the arms of the family that you are bidding that you can not refuse.
The most beautiful thing happens with "I have another Facebook account" no advice. You're still part of this hearth, so that you know, we were wrong, do not have one with you, we got it wrong. Keep it up, brother.
short, you put it in such a way that you think is going to die! Today
giving up, but tomorrow I'll make it!

Saturday, June 19, 2010

Where Can I Find A Bmx For Under £100

Sul campionato del mondo di calcio



All the big European teams have lost matches against teams considered easy to nations deemed poor or destitute, or a racing history and technique that would keep them away from success with the "big".
Before the end of qualifying to the knockout stage, I would hazard a guess that has the flavor of the anti-globalization, anti-capitalist breathing and heart of a fan who has the blood calcium, but prefers to follow Only Championships world considered at least on the surface of most authentic football tournaments.

A football match is something very similar to life
in a final, the game far more important, the duration will be determined, but according to the setbacks can be no recovery. If there is no advantage of either, the teams have extra time to fight again. If this time is not conclusive it will pull the penalty shootout. Rightly called lottery. Borges was not the poet who invented the lottery in Babylon were nothing more than the cause of the existence of destiny in the world?
Everybody wants to win. If there was this assumption would not even play the game or more resemble a pantomime. As in all life circumstances of each matter, and as with all football bets is not always easy to assume something that can have multiple outputs.
What happened to the teams of the richest noble European countries?
E 'success in identifying what happens when the method for the realization of a desire to do the opposite of what is needed. It is a psychological interpretation, I think its a "scientific" explanation (and complex) and some losses of the first draw of Italy. These players
grown and fed in the club drinking them at the source of abundance when they do not take to the field to play soccer. They discuss the awards, the shape of the weight of the consistency of the ball (missing the issue is not a minor degree of roundness) and forget to be a nation, a detail that in my perspective of world peace does not consider secondary ever.
Moral of the story. It is not their fault, poor things. And 'our fault. Incensed them, want them beautiful and tattooed, but also rhetoric and dialectic, we want them moral but not moralistic, loyal to their duty, but not exorbitant, extravagant or less shameless ... Who pays them their salaries? those who create that world of glitter for those that then we end up in with feet and head? It is we who want them and so that they too want to be. To feed a football player is sacrosanct, no one is denied a Ferrari, but I also want to see players who play for the sake of playing.
Beckham Dear, if you despair with the suit as an assistant rather than become a full London smoke valued at several thousand pounds, perhaps the British public would believe in the sincerity of most of your disappointment.