All the big European teams have lost matches against teams considered easy to nations deemed poor or destitute, or a racing history and technique that would keep them away from success with the "big".
Before the end of qualifying to the knockout stage, I would hazard a guess that has the flavor of the anti-globalization, anti-capitalist breathing and heart of a fan who has the blood calcium, but prefers to follow Only Championships world considered at least on the surface of most authentic football tournaments.
A football match is something very similar to life
in a final, the game far more important, the duration will be determined, but according to the setbacks can be no recovery. If there is no advantage of either, the teams have extra time to fight again. If this time is not conclusive it will pull the penalty shootout. Rightly called lottery. Borges was not the poet who invented the lottery in Babylon were nothing more than the cause of the existence of destiny in the world?
Everybody wants to win. If there was this assumption would not even play the game or more resemble a pantomime. As in all life circumstances of each matter, and as with all football bets is not always easy to assume something that can have multiple outputs.
What happened to the teams of the richest noble European countries?
E 'success in identifying what happens when the method for the realization of a desire to do the opposite of what is needed. It is a psychological interpretation, I think its a "scientific" explanation (and complex) and some losses of the first draw of Italy. These players
grown and fed in the club drinking them at the source of abundance when they do not take to the field to play soccer. They discuss the awards, the shape of the weight of the consistency of the ball (missing the issue is not a minor degree of roundness) and forget to be a nation, a detail that in my perspective of world peace does not consider secondary ever.
Moral of the story. It is not their fault, poor things. And 'our fault. Incensed them, want them beautiful and tattooed, but also rhetoric and dialectic, we want them moral but not moralistic, loyal to their duty, but not exorbitant, extravagant or less shameless ... Who pays them their salaries? those who create that world of glitter for those that then we end up in with feet and head? It is we who want them and so that they too want to be. To feed a football player is sacrosanct, no one is denied a Ferrari, but I also want to see players who play for the sake of playing.
Beckham Dear, if you despair with the suit as an assistant rather than become a full London smoke valued at several thousand pounds, perhaps the British public would believe in the sincerity of most of your disappointment.
