Lock Operating In Vip Suitcase

comma 22



" Early elections if the majority is not compact " , said the president of the Chamber Renato Schifani, referring to the mood of course more or less underground of some representatives of the PDL. But what has really wanted to say?

" If you, the members of this party, will vote no compact disgust (sic) bill that will save our pater premier of jail (for a short process on the bill (read " dead ") will put the trust and confidence if not a majority government falls), then in close elections - because they do not even think that we can find another majority - you, traitors, Judas, Joseph's brothers etc.. will not find anyone willing to run for ever and ever, because we are not traitors and left candidate is not a candidate (at least they say) condemned, convicted of friends, ex-friends convicted of . "

Where is the catch-22 ?

It 's like Schifani had said: If you vote the law is not subject to the government, but you do not want the government to fall, you do not vote the law, because it would be foolish to lose the post of deputy or senator , no? If you're not mad enough to want to vote this bill and still lose the seat in parliament, whether it is falling because you're never more re-elected, then you will be just as crazy to vote for it! But how can I be crazy to do something and be just as crazy to do the exact opposite? You can not be mad either way, right? So what? I must really say papal papal paro paro, you have to do?