"The universe is not the result of chance, as some would have us believe," said a few days ago, the Pope, because "we are invited to read contemplating something profound : Wisdom of the Creator, the inexhaustible imagination of God, His infinite love for us. " The conclusion, apparently positive attitude towards scientific theories is that only the religious explanation is able to "explain the ultimate meaning of reality."
Since these statements may seem reasonable at first glance, I think about religion, rather, on religioni, perché la ragione è di tutti gli uomini, mentre le religioni no, quindi anche se l'ateismo i credenti cercano di farlo passare per un credo fideistico, cercherò di mostrare perché sono ateo e non riesco a credere che ci siano persone che credono e che ascoltando simili parole del Papa subito dopo non smettano di credere.
Le religioni innanzi tutto sono talmente ragionevoli che per convincere le persone a credere si racconta loro che se ci credi allora sei buono, se non ci credi sei già di per questo cattivo, ma in più vai all'inferno e rischi di portarci anche tutta la tua famiglia se non vai particolarmente a genio al principale. E quanto sono ragionevoli le religioni è dimostrato dal fatto che non è assolutamente need to put me to explain what the hell because we all know, in fact tell us about it since childhood and give a lot of room for people who speak on television, whereas in nine years, instead of being the Breakfast with the body of Christ one wants to know something about the theory of punctuated equilibrium.
But look at the world through the eyes of these religious authorities: it is an intelligent design, someone has thought from beginning to end and the mere fact that someone is good, infinite and omnipotent makes smart, so smart :
was planned that would create a number of religions generally teach the same bale of intelligent design in particular, but each teaches a different version of the dance alone, so that these disagreements are created on the same thing slightly different for each one that gets to the point that believers of one of the other ones to make bombs. Then it was predicted that intelligently were asked all along religious freedom, since every religion believes in being true and is not nice to say to those of other religions are wrong, a sin, so at least let him freedom to make mistakes. But it was agreed there would be atheists who do not even go to the hall of the brain to bomb anyone and that only I am not against religious freedom, since each si sceglie l'hobby che preferisce, ma sono anche a favore della libertà scientifica, la libertà civile e quella politica. Evidentemente ma era anche previsto che per poter praticare queste ultime libertà devo stare attento alla sensibilità dei credenti, non posso opinare in nessun modo quello che questi simpaticoni intelligenti credono, né posso mostrare i loro pregiudizi nei confronti delle suddette libertà, né le contraddizioni di chi crede che il suo sia il vero Dio mentre gli altri che credono in un altro vero Dio non credono nel vero Dio.
Non parliamo poi delle bestemmie! Per un credente sono un'offesa, per un linguista magari soltanto un ossimoro, ma credo che sia interessato a definire gli attributes of the deity in question, he's just looking for ways to sforgarsi, metaphysics fuck it highly. If you are an atheist I have no swearing and also no interest in it I do not think its a curse because when I have to vent about something, for example, the words "pig" and "God", spoken in succession, for me not to have meaning. So in that intelligent design was expected to arise that someone did note that if you offend the believers so long to hear those two little words in succession, perhaps they came to doubt that this God, good, good and just right in hindsight what kind of world we live in perhaps might belong, at least in hypothetical to breed more pigs than to that of the gods, but only because of habit metaphorical pigs is attributed to a large or cleaning or to conduct a perfect analogy.
Non parliamo poi delle bestemmie! Per un credente sono un'offesa, per un linguista magari soltanto un ossimoro, ma credo che sia interessato a definire gli attributes of the deity in question, he's just looking for ways to sforgarsi, metaphysics fuck it highly. If you are an atheist I have no swearing and also no interest in it I do not think its a curse because when I have to vent about something, for example, the words "pig" and "God", spoken in succession, for me not to have meaning. So in that intelligent design was expected to arise that someone did note that if you offend the believers so long to hear those two little words in succession, perhaps they came to doubt that this God, good, good and just right in hindsight what kind of world we live in perhaps might belong, at least in hypothetical to breed more pigs than to that of the gods, but only because of habit metaphorical pigs is attributed to a large or cleaning or to conduct a perfect analogy.
What does declare that the world is the result of intelligent design if the majority of religions in a certain percentage is made up of idiots? At least the atheists, who mostly consider themselves smart, do not insist on the causes of their intelligence, because they shift responsibility for their actions on their heads, not on a hypothetical deity. In fact, the god is only a hypothesis and not one of the more plausible, indeed it is one of the most improbable in all points of view. The world should make statements that have at least some degree of certainty and trust your intuition or your intelligence. As long as you believe in the stories of faith or just because someone claims the right to define authoritative on a given subject will not be free to express our opinions, we will have the ability to feel free. I am all for religious freedom, never in my life steal to defend freedom of religious men, but men of religion must also defend my scientific freedom, otherwise I can not fail to call them fundamentalist and dogmatic.
0 comments:
Post a Comment